Eploy vs Greenhouse: Choosing the Right ATS for Your Business
TL;DR
Choosing the right Applicant Tracking System (ATS) is crucial for efficient hiring. Eploy and Greenhouse are popular choices, but which one fits your business needs? This article provides a detailed comparison to help UK/EU hiring managers make an informed decision. We'll explore each platform's strengths, features, pricing, and more. By the end, you'll know which ATS aligns best with your hiring strategy.
When neither Eploy nor Greenhouse solves CV screening depth
If you are comparing Eploy vs Greenhouse because your team is overloaded with applications, include Marxel as the specialist third option. Eploy and Greenhouse can manage ATS workflow, but Marxel is built for first-pass CV screening: it turns the job description and briefing notes into weighted criteria, ranks CVs in bulk, and shows transparent reasoning for every Aligned, Potential, Hold, or Unclear candidate.
The practical split is simple: keep Eploy or Greenhouse when you need the applicant tracking system, HRIS, or pipeline workflow; use Marxel when the buying question is how do we screen and rank this CV batch faster without losing the evidence behind each decision?
| Need | Best fit |
|---|---|
| Manage the full applicant pipeline | Eploy or Greenhouse, depending on workflow fit |
| Rank a high-volume CV batch with transparent reasoning | Marxel |
| Add screening without replacing the ATS | Marxel beside your current ATS |
| Explain why a candidate was shortlisted, held, or rejected | Marxel criteria, evidence, and action buckets |
At-a-Glance Comparison
| Feature | Eploy | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | UK public sector and enterprises | Enterprise and high-growth companies |
| Public pricing | Custom pricing | Custom enterprise pricing |
| Category | Applicant tracking or recruitment workflow | Applicant tracking or recruitment workflow |
| AI CV screening | Check plan-specific screening features | Check plan-specific screening features |
| UK GDPR and DPA details | Verify vendor documentation | Verify vendor documentation |
| UK support hours | Verify vendor documentation | Verify vendor documentation |
Use this table as a buying checklist, then confirm current plan details with each vendor. Last updated June 2026.
GDPR and Candidate Data: Eploy vs Greenhouse
For UK and EU hiring teams, the GDPR question is not simply whether Eploy or Greenhouse has a data processing agreement. The practical question is whether your recruiters can control candidate retention, respond to access or deletion requests, document screening decisions, and avoid unsupported automated decision-making.
| GDPR workflow area | What to check in Eploy | What to check in Greenhouse | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data processing agreement | Confirm DPA terms, subprocessors, and international transfer safeguards | Confirm DPA terms, subprocessors, and international transfer safeguards | Vendor paperwork must match your hiring process |
| Candidate retention | Check whether retention rules can be automated by role, region, or status | Check whether retention rules can be automated by role, region, or status | Manual cleanup becomes risky at high applicant volume |
| Deletion and access requests | Verify export, delete, and audit workflows before rollout | Verify export, delete, and audit workflows before rollout | Candidates can request access or deletion of personal data |
| Screening explainability | Confirm how notes, scores, and rejection reasons are recorded | Confirm how notes, scores, and rejection reasons are recorded | Recruiters need defensible reasons for shortlist decisions |
| AI-assisted screening | Keep a human review step and document the rubric used | Keep a human review step and document the rubric used | Avoid treating automated scores as final hiring decisions |
If your main compliance risk is explaining why candidates were shortlisted or rejected, the ATS comparison should include the screening layer as well as the applicant database. A clear rubric, human review, and auditable notes are often more important than the brand name of the ATS.
- Ask for the DPA and subprocessor list before signing.
- Test candidate deletion and export workflows during trial or onboarding.
- Document the screening rubric used for each role.
- Keep human review in the loop for AI-assisted ranking or bucketing.
TL;DR Summary
Eploy excels in serving UK public sector and enterprises with tailored solutions, while Greenhouse is ideal for enterprise and high-growth companies due to its robust feature set. Choose Eploy if you need strong UK compliance and local job board integration. Opt for Greenhouse for advanced analytics and global collaboration features. Both offer unique strengths depending on your business priorities and scale of operations.
---
At-a-Glance
Comparison
| Feature | Eploy | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | UK public sector and enterprises | Enterprise and high-growth companies |
| Starting price | Research needed | Research needed |
| UK GDPR compliance | Research needed | Research needed |
| UK job boards | Research needed | Research needed |
| AI screening | Research needed | Research needed |
| Support timezone | Research needed | Research needed |
---
Company
Overview
Company Overview
Eploy was founded with a focus on providing recruitment software solutions tailored for the UK market. Headquartered in Kidderminster, UK, Eploy has built a strong reputation in the public sector and large enterprises. Its customer base includes various UK government bodies and educational institutions, making it a go-to for organisations needing robust compliance and security features.
Greenhouse, founded in 2012, is based in New York City. It has rapidly grown to become a leader in the ATS market, especially among high-growth and enterprise companies. Greenhouse is renowned for its innovative approach to recruitment, offering advanced features that support global hiring processes. Its customer portfolio includes tech giants and multinational corporations, highlighting its appeal to businesses seeking sophisticated hiring solutions.
Detailed Feature Comparison
When comparing Eploy and Greenhouse, several key features come into play:
- CV Parsing and Screening: Eploy offers robust CV parsing with a focus on UK-specific requirements, helping recruiters filter candidates quickly. Greenhouse, on the other hand, provides advanced screening tools with customizable workflows suitable for diverse global recruitment needs.
- AI/Automation Features: Both platforms leverage AI to enhance automation, but Greenhouse takes the lead with its predictive analytics and decision-support tools, which are particularly beneficial for large-scale operations.
- Integrations: Eploy provides seamless integration with UK job boards, making it ideal for local recruitment. Greenhouse excels with its wide array of integrations, supporting international job boards and various HR tools.
- Reporting and Analytics: Greenhouse offers comprehensive analytics that help businesses track hiring metrics and optimize recruitment strategies globally. Eploy's reporting is geared towards compliance and efficiency within the UK, providing detailed insights tailored to local regulations.
- Collaboration Features: Greenhouse shines with its collaborative features, supporting teams across multiple locations with ease. Eploy offers strong collaboration tools but is more suited to teams operating primarily within the UK.
Pricing Comparison
Both Eploy and Greenhouse offer flexible pricing models, but with differences worth noting:
- Free Tiers and Trials: Greenhouse typically offers a trial period for new users to explore its features. Eploy may provide custom pricing upon request, often tailored to specific organisational needs.
- Per-Seat vs Per-Job Pricing: Eploy generally leans towards a per-job pricing model, which can be beneficial for organizations with fluctuating hiring needs. Greenhouse often uses a per-seat pricing model, which might suit companies with consistent hiring demands.
- What's Included: Eploy's packages often include UK-specific compliance features and local job board integrations. Greenhouse provides a range of global features, such as advanced analytics and extensive integration options.
- Total Cost for a 10-Person Team: Pricing varies widely based on custom needs and feature selections. Companies are encouraged to contact both Eploy and Greenhouse for detailed quotes tailored to their specific requirements.
User Experience
In terms of user experience, both platforms offer intuitive interfaces, though there are distinctions:
- Ease of Setup: Eploy is praised for its straightforward setup process, especially for UK-based organisations. Greenhouse requires more configuration but offers extensive customization options.
- Learning Curve: Eploy generally has a gentle learning curve, ideal for teams familiar with UK recruitment practices. Greenhouse’s depth of features might require more training but provides greater long-term benefits.
- Interface Design: Both platforms offer sleek, user-friendly designs, though Greenhouse’s interface is often lauded for its modern aesthetic.
- Mobile Access: Greenhouse provides robust mobile access, ideal for on-the-go recruitment. Eploy also supports mobile access, though its features are more focused on desktop use.
Who Should Choose Eploy
Eploy is best suited for organisations within the UK public sector or those heavily reliant on local compliance regulations. Its strengths in integrating with UK job boards and providing tailored compliance solutions make it ideal for medium to large enterprises that prioritize regulatory adherence. Additionally, Eploy's flexible pricing model can accommodate organisations with varying hiring volumes, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses seeking efficient, locally-focused recruitment solutions.
---
Who
Should Choose Greenhouse
Greenhouse is an excellent choice for enterprise and high-growth companies that operate on a global scale. Its advanced analytics, extensive integrations, and collaborative tools make it perfect for large teams and multinational corporations. If your business demands sophisticated recruitment processes and the ability to scale internationally, Greenhouse offers features that support complex workflows and diverse hiring needs.
Who Should Choose Greenhouse
Greenhouse is an excellent choice for enterprise and high-growth companies that operate on a global scale. Its advanced analytics, extensive integrations, and collaborative tools make it perfect for large teams and multinational corporations. If your business demands sophisticated recruitment processes and the ability to scale internationally, Greenhouse offers features that support complex workflows and diverse hiring needs.
---
Verdict
Choosing between Eploy and Greenhouse depends largely on your business's specific needs. Eploy is a strong contender for UK organisations that prioritize local compliance and efficient integration with domestic job boards. Greenhouse, however, stands out with its global reach and advanced analytic capabilities, making it ideal for international enterprises seeking comprehensive recruitment solutions. Evaluate your organisation’s scale, compliance needs, and growth ambitions to make the most informed decision.
Eploy vs Greenhouse FAQs
Looking for an alternative to both?
If neither option fits your needs, Marxel offers AI-powered CV screening built specifically for UK/EU businesses with native GDPR compliance.
Learn more about Marxel